ADPE Elements in .NET Access DataMatrix in .NET ADPE Elements

How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:

ADPE Elements using visual .net topaint ecc200 with web,windows application pdf417 2d barcode Define ADPE element tax .net vs 2010 Data Matrix onomy (e.g.

, policy, guideline, procedure, and standard) Define the process for developing and improving ADPE elements Delineate implementation responsibilities. Document Templates Present a list of candi VS .NET ECC200 date document types for consideration when planning or replanning a software systems development project Provide templates for these document types to serve as a starting point for constructing each document Provide guidance for identifying document sets appropriate to projects or different classes within your organization Allow the seller and customer to define expectations about a document. The column labelled "Co mments" offers additional insight into the role and orientation of the elements listed. Among other things, this column offers suggestions for consolidating two or more elements (e.g.

, folding the Acceptance Testing Cycle element material into an appendix in the Independent Product Assurance element or the Configuration Management element). We remind you that the elements listed in Table 8-1 are those discussed in preceding chapters or introduced and discussed in this chapter. With the possible exception of the "Software Systems Development Process" and "Change Control Board" elements, no element listed is mandatory.

The number and type of elements that you choose to construct for your ADPE will probably be quite different from those listed in the table. The table is intended to start your thinking for planning your global ADPE needs. We also remind you that the ADPE taxonomy we use in this book (i.

e., "policy,""guideline," "procedure," and "standard") is just one way to categorize ADPE elements (for this reason, we have omitted these labels from the first column in Table 8-1). Furthermore, within this taxonomy, these labels may sometimes be used interchangeably for various reasons.

For example, as indicated in Figure 8-9, the Software Systems Development Process element is labelled "Policy." From its statement of purpose and the definition of ADPE element. Successful Software Development, Second Edition "procedure" given earli er in this book, it might have made more sense to label this element "Procedure." However, because in some organizations the label "policy" carries more of an authoritative ring than does "procedure," this label may be more appropriate. Before closing the discussion of the issue "What ADPE elements should be included in your SEE," we return briefly to Figures 8-10, 8-11, and 8-12.

Figure 8-10 (Document Templates Standard) stresses that the real value of including documentation standards in your ADPE extends beyond the document outlines. The Document Templates element should plug into the rest of the ADPE by addressing such key considerations as (1) a process for deciding what documents to use on which types of projects and (2) document review guidance (e.g.

, important things to look for in a document of a given type for instance, does a software test plan contain a discussion of the system to be tested ). Regarding Figure 8-11 (Project Tracking Guideline), project tracking techniques addressed should also incorporate items included in other ADPE elements. For example, as discussed in 4, CCB minutes should include, among other things, an action item list with due dates.

These lists provide a project tracking technique that should be explicitly called out in the Project Tracking element. Also, as described in 3, the seller deliverable tracking form is used to track a product as it wends its way through the organization"s software systems development process. For this reason, this form should be addressed in the Project Tracking element as a project tracking aid.

Figure 8-12 (Software Development Life Cycle Definition Guideline) provides guidance for constructing a life cycle or life cycles pertinent to a given software project. As such, this guideline is a project planning aid. For this reason, some organizations may find it helpful to fold the material in this guideline into a appendix to the Project Plan Development Process element discussed in 2, rather than placing the material in a stand-alone element.

The heart of the material is the guiding principles, examples of which are shown under Section 3 in Figure 8-12. These principles are tied to the generic four-stage life cycle (i.e.

, WHAT, HOW, BUILD, and USE) introduced in 1, which is shown in the figure. They explain how to unfold the generic stages into stages that account for project particulars (e.g.

, schedule constraints, technology considerations, requirements uncertainty). Section 4 of the guideline indicates that example life cycle models should be included to illustrate the application of the guiding principles. Figure 8-12 also suggests that appendices can be used to illustrate how the life cycle constructed can be used to drive out management, development, and product assurance tasks.

This process is explained and illustrated in 2. We now discuss an SEE implementation issue pertaining to ADPE element structure. To this point, we have implicitly assumed that ADPE elements are generally documents of more than a couple of pages.

Also, as suggested in Figure 8-9, we have implicitly assumed that an ADPE should be constituted with ten or so elements. The issue that we now consider examines these assumptions. 4.

How should the ADPE be constituted (1) from a small number of elements (i.e., approximately ten), each consisting of tens of pages or more, or (2) from a large number of elements (i.

e., tens or more), each consisting of a couple of pages, or (3) some combination of (1) and (2) .
Copyright © . All rights reserved.